But… there’s still a lot of stuff that the states are keeping to themselves. Sites like Netflix, Hulu Plus and HBO GO (among others) that offer movie or TV streaming services in the US and UK for example, are not available in NZ. Netflix is one that’s received a lot of attention lately – for those of you who aren’t familiar with it, Netflix allows you to stream a large selection of movies on demand for a simple subscription fee, not a pay-per-movie. There’s streaming TV also, the options are vast.

Now, there’s been a lot of people posting details on ways to get around this geographic restriction, and even more speculating why it exits in the first place, but be it political, commercial or whatever other reason, get around it we shall. I decided it’s time to help piece together some of the bits around the net and hopefully give enough info for novice and advanced user alike.

I’m going to show you a few different scenarios to get yourself connected to all that content, but before we start there’s a few things to be aware of:

• Legality: The general consensus is that there’s no laws being broken here. Various Internet providers in NZ and further afield have even setup a service to do this for you. BUT I’m no lawyer. If it’s something you’re REALLY worried about, you should have a look around make your own mind up.
• The content is coming from the US. That’s a fair way away even in internet terms, which imposes some limitations. The main one you’ll notice with Netflix is that you might not get their full HD movies (See here for more info on connection requirements and remember it’s not your plan speed but your speed to their server in the states!). You can still stream those movies, they will just be delivered to you at standard definition which is still usually plenty for most people.
• Streaming movies uses your bandwidth. This is the same no matter where it comes from (as a general rule) but keep an eye on your data usage and take note of your internet plan!
• This works now, and has done so for quite some time. But as it’s not standard usage, providers like Netflix may make changes in the future that stop this from working. They haven’t made any noises about it, but it’s a possibility either directly or indirectly.
• Some will tell you this is what you do to replace Sky. If you’re a Sky subscriber (as I am) you need to have a look and see if just one or the other is the best option, or if you want to keep both for the things you want to watch. You might for example keep the basic Sky package for the channels it offers but biff your Sky Movies in favour of putting those funds towards Netflix. Basically, make your own mind up based on content and budget.

Lets start with probably the easiest scenario. Do you have an Apple TV? Yes? Excellent, you can get up and running pretty fast.

Netflix on Apple TV

Netflix on Apple TV

Difficulty: Low
Time required: 10 to 30 minutes for most users
Costs (at the moment anyway): $4.99/month (USD) for remote DNS, and $7.99/month (USD) for Netflix itself

This setup on the Apple TV will allow you to watch Netflix through it using what’s called a remote DNS, without messing with any of your other devices (e.g. Your desktop computer still won’t be able to access Netflix). This is good for someone who’s not that tech-savvy as there are sometimes unintended consequences of having all your devices use the remote DNS service.

What you should know before you start: Part of this setup requires you to basically tell your Apple TV that you live in the US. This works fine for our purpose but does have a side effect that you can’t use your NZ iTunes account from the Apple TV. Not a big issue for most, but if you watch movies purchased through Apple iTunes you need to decide if Netflix is a suitable replacement.

Still keen? Sweet! First head on over to Unblock us. It’s a service that helps you get access to the right information (it’s the remote DNS service I just mentioned). If you want to know more there’s info on the site, but in my opinion it’s one of the best ways to do it, so just do it. You can register for a free week trial, or $4.99/month (USD). They have instructions for lots of devices, but the version of it for Apple TV is here.

Note that you have to change both DNS and location settings to make it act like it’s in the US. Once that’s setup, you should see and be able to use the Netflix application on your Apple TV to connect.

Assuming you don’t have a Netflix account already (from time overseas or by registering an account at someone else’s place that has this going already), the Apple TV Netflix account should let you set one up. Just follow your nose, it should be self explanatory (I did mine over a computer but I’ll review the app method more if people are getting stuck). If you have to enter a postcode for your *cough* US Address *cough*, just use the good old 90210.

For those who aren’t just satisfied with getting it up and running but want to find out what else might be possible, Apple have a little marketing blurb that gives you an idea of what else might be out there which you can read here!

That’s it for now. Next on the list… well we’ll see. If there’s a particular device you’d like to get up and running or if you’re still having trouble, leave a comment down below and I’ll see what I can do to help.

Ciao!

The post Netflix and other US restricted content in NZ appeared first on Random Insanity.

So, what gets me into a suit and onto national TV you ask? Well it’s a new campaign called “Drop the Rate Mate”, and basically it’s a movement lending its support and allowing the public to better support the current draft recommendation issued by the Commerce Commission on Mobile Termination Rates.

The campaign was launched on the 11th of August 2009 and initially there are 8 organisations supporting the campaign, including Airnet, Consumer NZ, Federated Farmers, FoMA, NZUSA, TUANZ, 2degrees and Unite, and is chaired by Matthew Hooton of Exceltium. The key however is that it’s actually designed as a way for every day New Zealanders to have a voice to battle against the well financed incumbents: Everyone deserves their say!

The full Commerce Commission report can be found here _(pdf) if you’re sufficiently interested; but here I’ll try to summarise a few key points and throw a few more facts amongst all the debate (even though there’s plenty of misinformation to wade through).

A Few Definitions:

MTAS: Mobile Termination Access Services. Incorporates Mobile-to-Mobile, Fixed-to-Mobile and Short-message-service termination rates.

Key Recommendations:

While the report is not a final report, it is expected that after public submissions are taken the key recommendations will still hold. These two key recommendations are that:

• MTAS should be regulated. This would be done by making the change listed as paragraph 959 (page 206) of the draft
• That the revised undertakings submitted by Telecom, Vodafone and 2degrees should not be accepted (Paragraphs 960 and 961)

There are a couple of reasons that MTAS are being investigated. One is that it is a barrier to entry, which has unfortunately combined with 2degrees participation in the droptherate campaign has led some to claim that it’s all a big marketing stunt by them because they can’t compete normally. For the record I don’t think that’s accurate personally; 2degrees have already launched competitive pricing. A MTR reduction will definitely help them compete on a more level playing field but if they don’t change 2degrees will still battle away and I believe still be commercially viable.

Barrier to Entry

The barrier is best summed up by the following image…

Figure 1: MTAS Between Mobile Carriers. Each customer makes one equal call to every other customer on other networks. For the illustration I've chosen a communication that leads to a 15c MTR each. Source: Daniel Hopkirk. (Click image for larger version)

The situation is this: The new carrier “C” comes on board and initially has a significantly lower customer base than the other two incumbents. Logically, with less on-net customers, the majority of calls and txts will be bound for another network. Equally, as the majority of phone users are not on their network, very few calls or txts from other networks will be destined for the new carrier. This leads to a significant imbalance in MTAS paid by Carrier C when compared to that which is paid and/or recouped by the other Carriers.

“… the provision of [mobile termination rates] at prices above cost represents a barrier to efficient entry and expansion in the retail mobile services market.”

NZ Commerce Commission
Draft Report on whether the mobile termination access services should become designated or specified services
30 June 2009
Page 12, Paragraph xiv

Now Carrier A and Carrier B will tell you that they don’t really matter and that it all evens out, which may be accurate if there is a comparable volume of traffic inbound and outbound for your network, but for a new Carrier this isn’t the case. All this adds up to a significant cost that Carrier C has to pass onto it’s customers, which makes it very difficult to compete on cost, especially when the ComCom investigation shows that the rate charged by the other Carriers is significantly above what it costs them, and above internationally accepted rates.

And that leads us on to the second issue…

International Benchmarking

Sure, there’s nothing wrong with trying to make a profit, but one could speculate that the high rates serve to keep the two larger and relativity balanced carriers in a controlling position with minimal direct cost to them. For the record, the campaign estimates that over all it ends up with Telecom paying Vodafone a little more than the reverse, but this is a small price to pay to keep the market to themselves!

The ComCom investigation shows that we basically have some of the highest MTAS in the world. And just before anyone starts to talk about Bill and Keep regimes and all that stuff, yes it exists however that’s not what the ComCom are recommending and 2degrees have declared that even if that was implemented they would NOT charge their customers to RECEIVE calls as some people have tried to claim.

Table 1 below has a fair bit of info, but basically it covers what Telecom and Vodafone have volunteered to do and what the ComCom believes would be a likely regulated rate based on international investigations. Here’s what the headings mean (Note that as the investigation was carried out pre-launch of 2degrees, their rates are not included in this data):

• Current Voice/SMS Undertakings: MTR for voice calls under the current undertakings that Telecom and Vodafone have. This undertaking expires in 2012… Not sure why Vodafone SMS rate is’t listed in the report yet but it’s possibly just not part of their current undertakings.
• Revised Voice/SMS Undertaking: The proposed voluntary undertaking that Telecom and Vodafone submitted during the investigation. The recommendation of the report suggests that these are not excepted.
• Comparison of expected Voice/SMS MTR: This one’s a bit more tricky. It’s a comparison between what the ComCom expect the regulated rate would be (The “Factual” rate) and what they call the “Counterfactual” rate which they note as being…
  

  The counter-factual converts the undertakings rates weighted on a calender basis for each year. … These figures are then weighted for the proportion of mobile subscriber numbers on each of Vodafones and Telecoms networks.

  NZ Commerce Commission
  Draft Report on whether the mobile termination access services should become designated or specified services
  30 June 2009
  Page 14, Footnote #4

  Basically it’s designed to be an average per customer on those networks based on their proposed undertakings, or at least that’s how I understand it… I could of course be wrong…

Table 1: A comparison of current and proposed undertakings and expected regulated rates which would be inline with international expectations. Source: Data compiled from Telecom, Vodafone and the Commerce Commission, all listed in the ComCom report.

Summary

I know that I haven’t done the most brilliant job of walking through the information (my brain and the wee early hours of the morning in which this was thrown together don’t really agree with each other), and I may try tidy it up later, but I hope I’ve helped shed some more light on the story at the very least.

• Lowering MTAS would increase competition based on value and quality of service, rather than who most of your friends are already with (or forcing you to have a phone for each network)
• Compared against international carriers, Telecom and Vodafone’s proposed voluntary undertakings represent an insufficient decrease over too long a period to bring us into line within an acceptable time frame

If you’d like to support the campaign you can do so by going to http://droptheratemate.co.nz/ and adding your name to the petition.

For those who have any questions feel free to leave them here and I’ll try and help out where I can.

Links

Some links to other posts, articles or various other sources of information on the matter. Note: These have nothing to do with me and may be pro or con when compared to my view on the matter. Got any good ones I’ve missed? Let me know.

• 2009-08-18 – Stuff – 2degrees denies secret pay-for-calls plan
• 2009-08-12 – Hawkes Bay Today (clipping) – Campaign targets two providers’ mobile costs
• 2009-08-12 – The Dominion Post (clipping) – Cellphone charges ‘ripping off users’
• 2009-08-12 – Greens.org – Green Party backs the ‘Drop the Rate, Mate’ campaign
• 2009-08-12 – hawkesbay.co.nz – Drop the Rate, Mate! mobile phone users’ Campaign Launch
• 2009-08-12 – The Techsploder – Snow job on termination rates
• 2009-08-12 – Scoop – Are we getting a good deal with our cellphone charges?
• 2009-08-12 – NZ Herald – Phone giants say call for price rules could backfire
• 2009-08-12 – Scoop – Telecom and Vodafone Responses “Laughable”
• 2009-08-12 – Scoop – Campaign Launched Against Telecom/Vodafone Rip Off
• 2009-08-12 – Stuff – Cellphone charges ‘ripping off users’
• 2009-08-12 – NZ Herald – Phone giants say call for price rules could backfire
• 2009-08-12 – Computer World – Mobile termination row goes nuclear
• 2009-08-12 – Steve Zone – Droptherate – Are people being mislead by PR spin?
• 2009-08-11 – 3 News Radio Live – Lobby group wants regulation on cell phone market
• 2009-08-11 – Computer World – ‘Drop the rate mate’ campaign targets MTRs
• 2009-08-11 – KiwiBlog – Drop the Rate, Mate
• 2009-08-11 – Infonews – Campaign launched against Telecom and Vodafone rip offs
• 2009-08-11 – Steve Zone – Droptherate – How about telling us the truth?
• 2009-08-11 – Voxy – 81% Of Kiwis Say Drop The Rate, Mate!
• 2009-08-11 – Newstalk ZB – Vodafone & Telecom “ripping off” NZers
• 2009-08-11 – NBR – 2degrees rallies Consumer, Federated Farmers, service workers’ union to mobile pricing cause
• 2009-08-11 – Vodafone – The Truth About Mobile Termination Rates, Our response to the ‘drop the rate’ campaign
• 2009-08-11 – Infonews – Airnet, Consumer NZ, Federated Farmers, Federation of Maori Authorities, NZUSA, TUANZ, 2degrees & Unite
• 2009-08-11 – Voxy – Drop The Rate, Mate! Campaign Launch Notes
• 2009-08-11 – NZPA – National organisations join with 2degrees in mobile campaign
• 2009-08-11 – NZ Herald – 2degrees leads mobile charges fight
• 2009-08-11 – Computer World – ‘Drop the rate’ campaign not about 2 Degrees
• 2009-08-11 – One News/NZPA – Push to reduce mobile phone costs
• 2009-08-11 – Telecommunications Review – “Rates are already falling mate” – Telecom
• 2009-08-11 – Stuff – New group in mobile phone termination battle
• 2009-08-10 – Stuff – 2degrees on course, despite wobble
• 2009-06-25 – Stuff – Please terminate my high cell phone bill
• 2009-05-20 – OFCOM – Wholesale mobile voice call termination: Preliminary consultation on future regulation (multiple documents)
• 2009-03-26 – NBR – Tuanz: telcos charging $300 a year too much for mobile

The post Drop the Rate Mate – What’s it all about? appeared first on Random Insanity.